Select Page

Today’s article will go a little off track compared to our typical articles. That’s because we are looking at the American Des Moines class heavy cruiser USS Salem (CA-139) and her portrayal of the German raider Admiral Graf Spee in the classic 1956 film The Battle of the River Plate (Known in the United States as Pursuit of the Graf Spee). While some ships that took part in the well-known naval battle of 1939 were still around to play themselves, no suitable German ships survived the Second World War. Salem served as the stand-in for the German warship, despite being commissioned after the Second World War almost a full decade after the battle itself.

Salem, being a member of the newest and most powerful class of gun-based heavy cruisers to go to sea, provides a unique opportunity to see how fast warship technology progressed during that 10-year span. So in this article, we are going to compare USS Salem to the German cruiser she played as. In addition, we will take a look at how Salem would have compared to the British warships that took part in The Battle of the River Plate!

Shares
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
The German Deutschland class heavy cruiser Admiral Graf Spee at sea. No wait, that’s the American Des Moines class heavy cruiser USS Salem (CA-139). Actually, as far as the 1956 British film “The Battle of the River Plate” is concerned, the ships were almost one and the same! This was due to the fact that Salem played the role of the famous German raider in the movie! While Salem looked nothing like the ship she was portraying (Compare Salem to the picture of Admiral Graf Spee below), the film addressed this by stating the German ship was disguised to better carry out her raiding mission!

DISCLAIMER!

Now before we begin, I should like to point out that this is not a serious article. The comparison is merely for fun and it should not be taken seriously. This is due to several factors that cannot be accounted for not to mention the fact that Salem was an entirely different generation of cruiser. The comparison would be little different than comparing a modern nuclear-powered supercarrier to a fleet carrier of the Second World War. Of course, the new warship is going to be drastically more powerful! With this in mind, please enjoy the article!


Admiral Graf Spee
Shares
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
The actual Admiral Graf Spee at sea. When compared to the photo of the USS Salem above, the differences between the two ships are obvious. Not only was Admiral Graf Spee slightly smaller, but her armament was also drastically different compared to most heavy cruisers. Rather than the 8″ (20.3cm) guns that most heavy cruisers carried, the Graf Spee was armed with larger 11″ (28cm) guns. Furthermore, she carried only six weapons in two triple turrets. Salem, with nine 8″ guns in three triple turrets, had an extra gun forward.

Firepower:

Let’s take a look at the broadside weight for each warship. Broadside weight is the total amount of weight a warship can fire with a single volley against targets to the beam. This means that only the guns that are capable of firing in that direction are counted as a part of the weight.

Admiral Graf Spee had a respectable broadside weight of 3968lbs thanks to her six large 11″ (28cm) guns. Furthermore, when her secondary 5.9″ (15cm) guns were factored in (four of which could be utilized), her broadside weight increased even further to 4370lbs.

Admiral Graf SpeeGun Specifications
28 cm (11″) SK C/28 naval gun
Armor Piercing Shell Weight661.4lbs
Maximum Range39,890 Yards
Broadside Weight (x6 guns)3968lbs
15 cm (5.9″) SK C/28
Armor Piercing Shell Weight100.4lbs
Maximum Range24,060 Yards
Broadside Weight (x4 guns)401.6lbs

Compared to Admiral Graf Spee, Salem was armed with much smaller main guns. At only 8″ (20.3cm), they offered a much lower broadside weight of 3195lbs despite having 50% more gun barrels. When her secondary guns are factored in (and even with the advantage of having 100% more gun barrels to use), her total broadside weight still falls short of the German ship at 3636lbs total.

USS Salem (CA-139)Gun Specifications
8 inch (20.3cm)/55 Mark 16
Armor Piercing Shell Weight355lbs
Maximum Range30,050 Yards
Broadside Weight (x9 guns) 3,195lbs
5″(127mm)/38 Mark12
Armor Piercing Shell Weight55.18lbs
Maximum Range17,392 Yards
Broadside Weight (x8 guns)441lbs
Shares
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
An excellent overhead view of USS Salem. Her powerful battery of 8″ guns and 5″ secondary guns are prominent.

At first, one might think that the Graf Spee, armed with six 11″ (28cm) and 8 5.9″ (15cm) guns had a massive firepower advantage over Salem with her nine smaller 8″ and twelve 5″ guns. In addition to the heavier broadside weight, the German cruiser also enjoyed a significant range advantage.

However, things change a bit when the rate of fire over a minute is considered. As a Des Moines class cruiser, USS Salem was equipped with advanced autoloaders for her main battery that made up for the smaller shells with a much higher rate of fire!

Rate of FireAdmiral Graf Spee USS Salem
Main Battery2.5 Rounds Per Minute10 Rounds Per Minute
Total Shells Expended in a Minute15x 11″ Shells Per Minute90x 8″ Shells Per Minute
Throw Weight per Minute9,921lbs Per Minute31,950lbs Per Minute
Secondary Battery8 Rounds Per Minute18 Rounds Per Minute
Total Shells Expended in a Minute32x 5.9″ Shells Per Minute144x 5″ Shells Per Minute
Throw Weight per Minute3213lbs Per Minute7,946lbs Per Minute
Total Throw Weight13,134lbs Per Minute 39,896lbs Per Minute

Over a minute, the Graf Spee could fire 2.5x 11″ shells per minute per barrel, allowing her to expend some 9,921lbs of shells. With four of her 5.9″ guns firing at 8x shells per minute per barrel, the total throw weight increases to 13,134 lbs. USS Salem was in an entirely different world. Salem could fire 10x shells per minute per barrel from her 8″ guns. This gave her a maximum broadside throw weight of 31,950lbs of shells per minute! The difference became even greater when the secondary guns are factored in. Though mostly hand-loaded, the smaller 5″ guns could fire at around 18x shells per minute per barrel. This equated to 7,946lbs of shells per minute. Together, the primary and secondary batteries aboard the American cruiser would send out 39,896lbs of shells total in a minute.

Even with smaller guns, USS Salem could, at its maximum, throw roughly 3x the amount of shells against targets to the broadside compared to Admiral Graf Spee!

admiral graf spee
Shares
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
Another view of Admiral Graf Spee.

Now, let’s make things a little more interesting. What if we replaced Admiral Graf Spee with USS Salem? How would she compare to the three British cruisers present at the Battle of the River Plate?

Together, the three British cruisers brought sixteen 6″ (courtesy of the Leander class light cruisers HMS Achilles and HMS Ajax (later HMNZS)) and six 8″ (provided by York class heavy cruiser HMS Exeter) guns into action.

Achilles and Ajax (Leander Class Light Cruisers)Gun Specifications
BL 6 inch (152mm) Mk XXIII guns
Armor Piercing Shell Weight112lbs
Maximum Range25,480 Yards
Broadside Weight (x8 guns)896lbs
Exeter (York Class Heavy Cruiser)Gun Specifications
BL 8 inch (20.3cm) Mk VIII guns
Armor Piercing Shell Weight256lbs
Maximum Range30,650 Yards
Broadside Weight (x6 guns)1,536lbs

The Leander class light cruisers had an initial broadside weight of 1,792lbs (The two light cruisers each having an individual broadside weight of 896lbs) while HMS Exeter had a slightly heavier broadside weight of 1,536lbs. The entire cruiser flotilla had a total broadside weight of 3,328lbs. This was about equal to the initial Broadside of USS Salem (The American cruiser being slightly lower with just her 8″ guns and slightly higher when the 5″ guns are added in). However, the British ships had a significant disadvantage compared to Graf Spee, even with the combined weight of their respective broadsides.

battle of the river plate
Shares
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
HMNZS Achilles, one of Leander class light cruisers that was present during the Battle of the River Plate. At the time, she was still HMS Achilles.
Rate of FireAchilles and AjaxExeter
Main Battery8 Rounds Per Minute6 Rounds Per Minute
Total Shells Expended in a Minute64x 6″ Shells Per Minute36x 8″ Shells Per Minute
Throw Weight per Minute7,168lbs Per Minute9,216lbs Per Minute
Total Throw Weight7,168lbs Per Minute 9,216lbs Per Minute

Operating together, the three British cruisers could throw 16,384lbs of shells down range (7,168lbs per minute from sixteen 6″ guns and 9,216lbs per minute from six 8″ guns). While enjoying a slightly higher throw weight than the German Graf Spee, they still could not compete with the incredible amount of firepower that USS Salem could unleash.

Rate of FireBritish Cruiser Flotilla USS Salem
Total Shells Expended in a Minute64x 6″
36x 8″ Shells Per Minute
90x 8″ Shells Per Minute
144x 5″ shells Per Minute
Throw Weight per Minute16,384lbs Per Minute39,896lbs Per Minute

Armor

How about armor protection? Turns out Salem had the armor to compliment her firepower advantage.

Belt:

  • Salem – 6″ Max
  • Graf Spee – 3.9″ Max
  • Leander Class – 4″ Max
  • Exeter – 3″ Max

Deck:

  • Salem – 3.5″ Max
  • Graf Spee – 2.8″ Max
  • Leander Class – 2″ Max
  • Exeter – 1.5″ Max

Turret Protection:

  • Salem – 8″ Max
  • Graf Spee – 5.5″ Max
  • Leander Class – 1″ Max
  • Exeter – 1″ Max
battle of the river plate
Shares
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
HMS Exeter, a York class heavy cruiser, was the largest and most powerful of the British cruisers present at the Battle of the River Plate. She took the brunt of the damage inflicted by the German cruiser during the battle.

Powerplant

Despite heavier firepower and protection, the American cruiser was still slightly faster, thanks to a much larger powerplant.

Speed:

  • Salem – 32.66 knots @ 125,000shp
  • Graf Spee – 28.5 knots @ 53,260shp
  • Leander Class – 32.5 knots @ 73,000shp
  • Exeter – 32.5 knots @ 80,000shp

Range:

  • Salem – 10,500nmi @ 15 knots
  • Graf Spee – 16,300nmi @18.7 knots
  • Leander Class – 5730nmi @13 knots
  • Exeter – 10,000nmi @ 14 knots

It’s worth noting that Graf Spee did enjoy a substantially better operating range compared to the other ships. This was largely thanks to the highly efficient diesel powerplant. Not only was the range better on the German ship, but the cruising speed was significantly better as well.

Size

This is where the pieces start to fall into place. All of that impressive performance from USS Salem required a lot of hull volume to support it. USS Salem was a massive heavy cruiser and dwarfed the other ships here. At 716′ in overall length and with a beam of 76′ 6″, the American cruiser displaced 21,500 tons at full load. This was substantially larger than the German cruiser, a warship whose size garnered it the title “Pocket battleship” by media outlets of the day. Graf Spee was 610′ in overall length and 71′ at the beam. At full load, the German cruiser was just over 16,000 tons.

Salem was 34% larger than the German raider in displacement! The large size of Salem gets even more pronounced when compared to the British cruisers. The Leander class light cruisers were 555′ long overall and 56′ at the beam. At full load, they displaced just 9,740 tons. HMS Exeter, a heavy cruiser, was slightly larger at 575′ in overall length and 58′ at the beam. At full load, she displaced almost 10,500 tons. Together, the British cruiser flotilla displaced 29,980 tons. This meant that the entire British cruiser flotilla displaced just over 39% more tons than Salem by herself!

USS Salem, Admiral Graf Spee, & Final Thoughts

If anything, the statistics show that Germany likely would have loved having a cruiser of Salem’s caliber at the Battle of River Plate. She was faster and more heavily protected than Graf Spee of any of the British cruisers. Furthermore, those autoloading 8″ guns could produce a truly overwhelming amount of firepower. On the other hand, while Salem might very well have performed better at the Battle of the River Plate, she likely would not have served as well as Graf Spee in the raiding role. The diesel engines on the German cruiser gave her a major advantage in range and cruising speed that the American cruiser, even with 10 years of technological advantage, could not compete with.

Overall, it’s important to remember that this article is not a dig at the German or British ships. It doesn’t mean to suggest that the Des Moines class heavy cruisers are superships and are vastly superior to their contemporaries. Rather, it highlights the rapid advancements made in warship design in just over a decade. In a little over 10 years, cruisers became significantly larger and more powerful. The cruisers that started the Second World War could hardly imagine the capability of cruisers that were spawned by the end of it.

Further Links

Want to follow Navy General Board on Social Media? Check us out on the platforms below!

Help the Website grow by purchasing a Navy General Board Shirt!

More Great Articles

Check out our collection of articles. Some of our latest articles include:

Shares
Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!